Monday, 26 November 2012

Winston gets it very wrong on gay adoption

UKIP's culture spokesman and PPC for the upcoming Croydon North by-election, Winston McKenzie, has hit the papers again but for all the wrong reasons this time.

McKenzie has likened placing children with gay adoptive parents to child abuse, saying that it deprives them of the chance to grow up with a normal life.  This is absolutely not what the party's line is and certainly isn't a view shared by most UKIP members.

Winston is entitled to his personal opinions on gay couples adopting and if his faith is such that he believes it to be wrong then that is his prerogative but it is entirely inappropriate for him to make such comments during an election campaign when the world's press is looking at the party in the wake of the Rotherham baby snatcher scandal and if he does feel a burning desire to make this type of comment then he should be making it abundantly clear that he is speaking for himself only and not associating the rest of the membership with his views.

To sum up UKIP's position on gay couples adopting in a nutshell: a child needs a loving, secure and stable home and if a gay couple can provide that then that is in the best interests of the child.

Given a choice between a child having no mum and dad and two mums or two dads, you would hope that the majority of people would welcome a gay couple adopting a child that might otherwise spend their formative years in an institution or being passed around a succession of foster parents.  Every child has a right to feel safe and secure and to be bought up by people who care about them and depriving them of that opportunity because a 2,000 year old book about a man who lives in the sky who made the world in 6 days (but not dinosaurs because they hadn't been invented back then) says it's wrong is child abuse, not giving them two parents of the same sex.

I used to like Winston despite his colourful political history because he was full of energy and infectious enthusiasm but I've lost all respect for him over this.  In his role as spokesman on culture Winston has done much to promote a positive relationship with our friends in the Commonwealth but this appalling lack of judgement means he has to go.

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
It's alright, he'll get away with it, he's African.
You are just doing exactly what winston did by rubbishing religion because of your(the author)disbelief in god,just remember there are many UKIP supporters that are believers in god,as with winston you are entitled to your own opinion but make it clear that UKIP is not an atheist party and if it is UKIP is at least one vote down.
I'm not religious. Should I be railing against a person for believing in a God I don't believe in? Should I be a theophobe (sounds ridiculous doesn't it?) and demand that he accept there is no god?
I'm not gay. I really don't care what goes on in the beds of consenting adults but I know there are people to whom it matters. I accept their opinions - does that make me a homophobe?
The reason I'm commenting is that some people are displaying a lack of the very tolerance which they demand of everyone else. Aren't we always fighting against political correctness? Or does that only apply when it's a 'correctness' we ourselves don't agree with? Do you see where that takes us?
He was very foolish to answer the question put to him - I'm pretty sure he didn't just come out with it . It shows a lack of political awareness that politics is a filthy business where, I know from experience, everyone is trying to catch you out.
But then, UKIP candidates are not career politicians and this is one of our strengths.
Why does everyone have to be tagged a 'phobe or an 'ist? He made the human mistake of telling the truth as he sees it, in a political arena. Let's not hang the man for that.
1 reply · active 643 weeks ago
He is standing as an official candidate for UKIP. What he says will therefore be taken to represent the views of that party. Looks like David Cameron was absolutely right what he said about UKIP in 2006, and there was I toying with the idea of joining - NOT NOW!
This man is of Jamaican heritage. It's a well known fact that culturally Jamaicans are very against gay relationships full stop. In making a political objective statement, one must try at least, not to filter opinion through one's own culturally extreme views. See Stephen K Amos's documentary about this, he was very hurt when he researched this. Here we have Winston's own views. UKIP are for gay civil partnerships, this man is simply homophobic. His statement comes at a bad time when UKIP are gaining increasing recent popularity,
We have finally started to get the hang of this old politics nonsence

UKIP are called raciaist by the Cheap Labour party and backed up by CAST IRON DAVE and then a UKIP candidate say's something that the liblabconand the BBC want to make an issue of and low and behold he happens to be a black man !

Who's racist now

Post a new comment

Comments by