Sunday, 28 March 2010

Nikki: List

Whilst I have no way of knowing, did it not dawn on the previous author that she after 16 years may well have the personal contact details of friends and associates accumulated in that time, and would therefore not be breaching the Act.

As for the use of the logo, a simply question really, given there are so many versions, do they all have copyright protection, the party is not exactly hot on such things. Remember the butterflies.

Finally is it fair to use this blog to 'attack' Nikki.
Posted by The Pub Consultancy Service at 19:44
"Go to IntenseDebate"
Comments (3)

About the author:
The Pub Consultancy Service is an author at Bloggers4UKIP.

Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout
  • Logged in as
Loading...
+1 Vote up Vote down
wonkotsane's avatar - Go to profile

wonkotsane 85p · 782 weeks ago

Bob, Nikki didn't get my home address from me so where did it come from if not the UKIP membership list which she isn't supposed to use any more? Like I said, I'm still interested in what she gets up to but that doesn't mean others are and if someone complains not only can she get herself into trouble but the party as well. The UKIP logo probably isn't copyrighted, I don't know if it's even possible to copyright a party logo. The offence would probably be "passing off" unless there is a specific offence of a politician using a political party's logo without permission. Finally, there's been no attack against Nikki. It would have been very easy to attack her over the last few months - you know my personal views on the matter - but I think any discussion of her has been balanced and the fact that you're here posting in her defence despite my own opinions is surely evidence of that? As she's intending to sue the party, members aren't allowed to talk about her on the UKIP members forum in case the case is prejudiced so it's down to independent UKIP supporting blogs like this one to provide the opportunity to discuss it.
1 reply · active 782 weeks ago
0 Vote up Vote down
Peter Armstrong's avatar

Peter Armstrong · 782 weeks ago

If the Party owns the logo then it is copyright infringement if she uses it for her own gain. Which in turn can lead the party to take her to court if they feel they want too. Though as she been told not too use it then really she could be in trouble for it.

Though what ever her problem is though I do not support her action for suing a party when we trying to fixs the country. All we need is a UKIP having baggage to deal with when they have BBC and other big media ignoring the party as much as possible and on top dealing with 3 big party s that not really serving there own people.
0 Vote up Vote down
Josh O'Nyons's avatar

Josh O'Nyons · 782 weeks ago

Thats BOBFM not me

Post a new comment

Comments by