Tuesday, 28 August 2012

Spare a thought for those less fortunate

While UKIP members are still basking in the 12% predicted vote share - in front of the Lib Dems once again - in Sunday's Survation poll, we should spare a thought for those less fortunate than ourselves.  No, I'm not referring to the Lib Dems, I mean the English Democrats.

The political brain behind the English Democrats' consistently disastrous performance at every election they contest bar one and the man responsible for their awful public profile, terrible reputation, the BNP takeover of their party and attempted deals with terrorists, Steve Uncles, has read the Survation polling data and taken heart from the fact that 10% of the voting intention was for "nationalists".

Except it's not.  The 10% the English Democrats are laying claim to is all non LibLabCon and UKIP votes.  In this respect the English Democrats are not unlike the Tories who think they have an automatic right to any eurosceptic vote.  These "nationalists" include the Greens and Respect, one-world communists who have less respect for nations than Steve Uncles has for mentally-ill, suicidal bloggers and over half of the "other" votes was for the Green Party.

It's easy to see where the English Democrats are going wrong though when you consider that their campaigns guru is trying to spin an opinion poll where the English Democrats came bottom of the list of voting intentions as being a good thing rather than pretending it didn't happen as you would expect when the polling company can only find two people who said they would vote for you.

The "other" parties break down as follows:

Green 5.1%
SNP 2.2%
BNP 1.8%
Respect 0.5%
Plaid Cymru 0.3%
English Democrats 0.2%
Another Party 0.2%
Undecided 0.5%
Refuse 1%

Over half the "other" votes would go to the Greens, a party that's pretty much the polar opposite of the English Democrats.  Despite plundering the BNP's membership for assorted knuckledraggers and holocaust deniers, nine times as many people were less embarrassed to say they'd vote for the tainted BNP than the English Democrats.  The Respect Party, represented by George Galloway who's managed to offend half the population in the last couple of weeks trying to play down rape and now calling a Twitter follower a "window licker", can expect more than double the votes of the English Democrats.  The SNP can expect 2.2% of the UK-wide vote despite only contesting seats in Scotland and Plaid Cymru can expect 0.3% despite contesting only Welsh seats yet the English Democrats, who they proclaim as the English version of the SNP, can expect just 0.2% of the vote from contesting elections in 85% of the UK.

These aren't encouraging results for the English Democrats, they're an embarrassment second only to the embarrassment that has publicised them.  And to think, this is the party that said it was going to beat UKIP in the Barnsley by-election!

If there is anyone left in joke of an outfit who's serious about politics and isn't a BNP reject, come and join the other half of the English Democrats who've already made the move to UKIP.

Comments (5)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Old Albion's avatar

Old Albion · 656 weeks ago

As a FORMER supporter of the English Democrats. I now feel UKIP should be my home. In fact when it was mentioned UKIP will support a Parliament for England. I was sure UKIP would be my new political home. Whatever happened to that policy??
1 reply · active 656 weeks ago
As far as I'm aware it's going to be presented at conference but I need to check on that because it's starting to drag out a bit now. You're recognise some of it I'm sure. :o)
Your right to have a go a Uncles but let's not have a go at our Country Men & Women who are desparate to see some change in our Country , there is no point in our gloating over their mistake in the the partys that they did support and we cannot let a few maniacs tar them all with the same brush

We must find a way to UKIP them all , if we can forgive the former members of the LIBLABCON ( the biggest traitors of all ) we can surely work a system out where we can sort out the racist nutters from people who have just been naive
Being an exiled celt, I have never agreed with more talking shops which are known as Parish Councils/Town Councils/County Councils as well as the recent devolution of powers to Wales/Scotland and Northern Ireland. However, with the rampant march of modern technology, it is not beyond the scope of any political party to re-organise this 'talking culture' into a more active function whereby the electorate can actually see what is happening. The implementation of the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliament created very expensive buildings to talk about what they would like to do but do not have sufficient money to do it by themselves. Government Departments and Town Hall administrations have yet to understand that money does not grow on trees, it never has and never will. So from my perspective, the main question is:- "WHERE WOULD AN ENGLISH PARLIAMENT BE BASED. AND IS THERE A BUILDING THAT CAN IMMEDIATELY BE PUT TO USE WITHOUT SPENDING MILLIONS OF POUNDS THAT IS NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO OUR CASH-STRAPPED SITUATION?"
Old Albion's avatar

Old Albion · 655 weeks ago

Putting aside the fact no one worried about how much it would cost to build Hollyrood and the Welsh assembly building. That this concern only raises it's head when we English ask for our own parliament.
The good news is, it will cost nothing, zero, zip, chuff all.
The English parliament would sit in Westminster, the part known as 'the house of commons' It could also be reduced to circa 400 MP's by removing all Scots, Welsh and N.Irish MP's and by reducing the number of English constituencies.
The creation of an English parliament will at the same time create a new UK federation. MP's for each country looking after it's own affairs.
A new Federal body would be required to deal with any remaining reserved matters. It would need to be only around 100 federal 'senators' and could be housed in 'the house of lords' part of Westminster. At the same time making 850 lords redundant. Saving milluions in salary and expenses.

Post a new comment

Comments by